I found this in my notes for my English class... I figured I'd share them with 你 here.
In Classical times, heterosexuality, 或者 the 爱情 of a man for a woman, was considered to be "an animalistic urge to be slaked quickly only for the purpose of reproduction" (Henry Staten, English 202 instructor) while "platonic love" 或者 the 爱情 of a man for another man, was considered idealistic and "above the beasts."
Such close 老友记 were in fact called "lovers," like Hercules and Hylas. To fall in 爱情 with a man was the "proper" thing to do at the time, and signified a wonderous thing.
This "homosociality" as it has come to be known, is not exactly the same as homosexuality. Men touched, even kissed, but were not necessarily sexual with one another, 或者 at least they didn't consider it to be sex. They were at ease, would hold hands, and trusted men 更多 than they trusted their female counterparts.
However, as the Renaissance rolled about, and women's status was elevated to that of muses and Goddesses (Dante's Beatrice and Petrarch's Laura), the 爱情 between a man and woman was no longer considered that of a bestial urge, but indeed on par with the 爱情 shared between men.
Even in the Renaissance, however, the line between heterosexuality and homosexuality was still blurred with the homosocial concept, and everyone became, in a sense, bisexuals. William Shakespeare, one of the world's most famous Renaissance poets, is infamous for his ambiguous sexuality, embodied particularly in sonnet # 20 ("A man in hue all hues in his controlling/Which steals men's eyes and women's souls amazeth... But since she pricked thee out for women's pleasure/Mine be thy love, and thy love's use their treasure"). Not to mention his blatant commentary on the ambiguity of sexuality in general in his plays "Twelfth Night" and "As 你 Like It."
As the Renaissance wound down, however, and we entered the Age of Enlightenment, 基督教 regained its stance on the topic of homosexuality and it became one of the cardinal sins for a long time, up until the twentieth century. The homosocial culture of Classical Times and the Renaissance was dashed, and men became afraid of touching each other even in the most casual of ways. Where they would have comfortably held hands walking down a road, 或者 kissed one's cheek as a thank you, they became isolated, and aggressive, for women were once again considered beneath them and untrustworthy, and they 迷失 their platonic lovers, and thus became malcontented, and we 迷失 much of the art and beauty produced 由 the Renaissance.
Even now, through Pride Parades and media representation, homosexuality is still considered 由 many to be "evil" 或者 "sinful" based on certain passages of the Bible (specifically the book of Leviticus) 或者 the Koran 或者 other Holy 图书 and scriptures. My only purpose in 写作 this is basically to ask this question.
We consider many things from the Classical and Renaissance eras to be beautiful and intellectual achievements of man. Meanwhile, in modern times, we consider ourselves to be lazy and belligerent, defensive and close-minded. When there were no "rules" on who one could 或者 couldn't love, and when no one was trying to infringe upon everyone else (politically, religiously, and artistically), mankind made some of his best achievements. Mankind was also sexually ambiguous. And now in a world full of labels and judgment, we consider it our responsibility to tell others when they're wrong according to our own values. Why do 你 think this is?
Mellow out, people. Lighten up, and stop being so judgmental. "Straight" people were once considered unusual and heterosexuality was considered to be "less than human."
So are we progressing 或者 are we regressing?
I'll just sum it up.
Heterosexuality was once considered vulgar and necessary only for reproduction all the way through the Renaissance Era. "True love" was thought to exist between two people of the same sex, not between a man and a woman. It was only in the Age of Enlightenment when 基督教 regained its foothold on 欧洲 that homosexuality once again became a sin.
All I'm saying is, our perspectives change with the time. Why tell someone else that they're wrong based on your set of values?
"You should 显示 courtesy and be cordial with each other, so that no one should consider himself superior to another, nor do him harm."
-The Prophet Muhammed
"Love Thy neighbor as 你 would yourself"
-Jesus
"Whatever 你 so wish that men would do to you, do so to them, for this is the law..."
-Matthew 7:12
In Classical times, heterosexuality, 或者 the 爱情 of a man for a woman, was considered to be "an animalistic urge to be slaked quickly only for the purpose of reproduction" (Henry Staten, English 202 instructor) while "platonic love" 或者 the 爱情 of a man for another man, was considered idealistic and "above the beasts."
Such close 老友记 were in fact called "lovers," like Hercules and Hylas. To fall in 爱情 with a man was the "proper" thing to do at the time, and signified a wonderous thing.
This "homosociality" as it has come to be known, is not exactly the same as homosexuality. Men touched, even kissed, but were not necessarily sexual with one another, 或者 at least they didn't consider it to be sex. They were at ease, would hold hands, and trusted men 更多 than they trusted their female counterparts.
However, as the Renaissance rolled about, and women's status was elevated to that of muses and Goddesses (Dante's Beatrice and Petrarch's Laura), the 爱情 between a man and woman was no longer considered that of a bestial urge, but indeed on par with the 爱情 shared between men.
Even in the Renaissance, however, the line between heterosexuality and homosexuality was still blurred with the homosocial concept, and everyone became, in a sense, bisexuals. William Shakespeare, one of the world's most famous Renaissance poets, is infamous for his ambiguous sexuality, embodied particularly in sonnet # 20 ("A man in hue all hues in his controlling/Which steals men's eyes and women's souls amazeth... But since she pricked thee out for women's pleasure/Mine be thy love, and thy love's use their treasure"). Not to mention his blatant commentary on the ambiguity of sexuality in general in his plays "Twelfth Night" and "As 你 Like It."
As the Renaissance wound down, however, and we entered the Age of Enlightenment, 基督教 regained its stance on the topic of homosexuality and it became one of the cardinal sins for a long time, up until the twentieth century. The homosocial culture of Classical Times and the Renaissance was dashed, and men became afraid of touching each other even in the most casual of ways. Where they would have comfortably held hands walking down a road, 或者 kissed one's cheek as a thank you, they became isolated, and aggressive, for women were once again considered beneath them and untrustworthy, and they 迷失 their platonic lovers, and thus became malcontented, and we 迷失 much of the art and beauty produced 由 the Renaissance.
Even now, through Pride Parades and media representation, homosexuality is still considered 由 many to be "evil" 或者 "sinful" based on certain passages of the Bible (specifically the book of Leviticus) 或者 the Koran 或者 other Holy 图书 and scriptures. My only purpose in 写作 this is basically to ask this question.
We consider many things from the Classical and Renaissance eras to be beautiful and intellectual achievements of man. Meanwhile, in modern times, we consider ourselves to be lazy and belligerent, defensive and close-minded. When there were no "rules" on who one could 或者 couldn't love, and when no one was trying to infringe upon everyone else (politically, religiously, and artistically), mankind made some of his best achievements. Mankind was also sexually ambiguous. And now in a world full of labels and judgment, we consider it our responsibility to tell others when they're wrong according to our own values. Why do 你 think this is?
Mellow out, people. Lighten up, and stop being so judgmental. "Straight" people were once considered unusual and heterosexuality was considered to be "less than human."
So are we progressing 或者 are we regressing?
I'll just sum it up.
Heterosexuality was once considered vulgar and necessary only for reproduction all the way through the Renaissance Era. "True love" was thought to exist between two people of the same sex, not between a man and a woman. It was only in the Age of Enlightenment when 基督教 regained its foothold on 欧洲 that homosexuality once again became a sin.
All I'm saying is, our perspectives change with the time. Why tell someone else that they're wrong based on your set of values?
"You should 显示 courtesy and be cordial with each other, so that no one should consider himself superior to another, nor do him harm."
-The Prophet Muhammed
"Love Thy neighbor as 你 would yourself"
-Jesus
"Whatever 你 so wish that men would do to you, do so to them, for this is the law..."
-Matthew 7:12
My Son attends a public school of approx. 60 highschool students, he will be 17 in August, He is a mature responsable young man, he has good grades and an after school job. the administrator is dead set against allowing any student to leave at the non class period lunch hr. even with a note from parent. Does the adm. have 更多 authority than parents. The lunch hr. is not considered a class period. Most students want to walk to the store thats on the same side of the 街, 街道 as the school and about 2 blcks away. The school lunch is not muc to be desired.