回答这一问题

辩论 问题

Animal rights 或者 animal research? why?

 ewb991 posted 一年多以前
next question »

辩论 答案

bri-marie said:
Both.

I think, when it comes to things like diseases, 动物 should be researched. Many diseases that effect humans, also effect animals, so it makes sense for them to be researched. (I also believe that humans should be tested and used for research as well.)

However, when it comes to things like make-up? No. Their right to live, and right not to be tortured comes first. If humans want make-up, humans should be tested to make sure it's safe.
select as best answer
posted 一年多以前 
para-scence said:
Animal rights.

I think it's wrong to take hold of any creatures life, just because 你 are superior to them. I'm not sure if it's a good analogy, but that's like forcefully taking someone who's mentally handicapped from their 首页 to research them. They still have a life, and family, and they are unable to defend themselves. I just think that's wrong. I think we should just leave 动物 alone and let them live their lives. And it's wrong to keep them trapped in a cage; that's basically taking their lives as well.
select as best answer
posted 一年多以前 
Chaann94 said:
Animal research.

I will always know the lives of the 20 cancer patients in a hospital are much 更多 worth than the lives of 1000 rats.
select as best answer
posted 一年多以前 
Dewheart said:
The vast majority of experiments on 动物 are done 由 students and the results of those studies are never published. Even in the case of actually looking for cures for diseases, it is unethical to cause suffering to an innocent being.
select as best answer
posted 一年多以前 
*
Because curing 10 years old cancer patients is unethical? What you're basically saying is we need to get back to the dark ages where people died of the flu. Because the flu medicine and stuff was invented via animal research. Also the small pocks are cured because of animal experiments. What you're saying "even in the case of curing diseases it's unethical" is just hilariously stupid.
Chaann94 posted 一年多以前
*
I never 说 we need to go back to the dark ages, so would 你 kindly not put words in my mouth? We can find alternatives to curing diseases that are not tested on animals. So 你 are willing to sacrifice millions of lives of 动物 who have done nothing to deserve the torture inflicted on them? I would 爱情 to find a cure for cancer, but in the case of animal testing, the ends don't justify the means. Even though I disagreed with your stance on animal testing I didn't use petty insults. Calling someone else's opinion "hilariously stupid" when they presented it in a respectful way, is simply immature and uncalled for.
Dewheart posted 一年多以前
ThePrincesTale said:
Neither. The greater good.

If that means a few mice have to be used in order to potentially create a vaccine that could save thousands of lives, then so be it.

On the same token, if some are killed for the sole purpose of.someone looking at their innards, then I don't see that as good.

Society over over the individual. It may be either human society 或者 animal society, each have their own circumstances.
select as best answer
posted 一年多以前 
next question »