The 最佳, 返回页首 5 Dumbest Complaints About Cartoon Characters

KataraLover This was an AMAZING video! I enjoyed every second of it. For a moment I didn't know what you meant by calling Aladdin Jasmine's arm candy but I guess in the Disney Princess franchise that he is sort of more her arm candy than she is in the movies and TV series. I won't deny that there are some offensive token chicks, token guys, and token racial characters. One example for me is Pepe Le Pew, who is a racist French stereotype. I'm definitely aware Miss Piggy has some haters but I find the even more people love her and consider her to be the best of The Muppets. I do wish that shows and movies had more than just one female character but it's better than none at all. Plus, I'm one of the few guys on Fanpop and in high school I was one of the few guys in choir. Does that make me sexist too? I should hope not! I'm hoping that since Webby is already an established character in the original Ducktales that she'll get just as much screentime as the boys, especially since she was a lot more unique, developed, and interesting than they are. They don't even have their own individual personalities. As always, I'm hoping Lola get become more fleshed out with her Space Jam personality in the future and get some shorts about her. It was kind of a questionable (though understandable) choice to give her a lack of screentime and not give her as much to do. But I have heard people complain that a smart, badass tomboy character just doesn't fit in with The Looney Tunes. Which I do get but I think that makes her unique among them. I don't think there should only be one kind of style that a group of characters are in because that makes them less unique. Unfortunately, I've been seeing A LOT of hate towards Lola recently and I HATE it! But moving on. Hating a sequel character just because they're a sequel character is STUPID! Plain and simple! A character should only be judged on their character, just like any other character. I've always thought of the Jack one as pathetic reason! I mean, he's not even really that sexualized. He doesn't go around shirtless, has any nude scenes where you see his butt (that's what fanart is for apparently), or has any BIG muscles. Yeah, he has some girl characters fawning all over him but so what? When I think of male characters that are sexualized I think of characters like Tarzan, Naveen, and Hercules. They're a lot more masculine and have been shown in their movies (but more so with Tarzan in the animated series when Jane's friends come to the jungle) to have girls fawning all over them and thinking they're sexy. Jack is way too scrawny with chicken legs and a boney butt to be what I consider sexy (even though I don't really consider male characters to be sexy). If a character is nothing but a sex object (which many claim Lola and Jessica are when they're a lot more than that) than I can understand that. But if they have personalities than they need to judge that instead. I mean, Holli Would is sexualized but she's a horrible character. I'll just say it, you said it all with Scrooge and Minnie. Nothing else can be said. Great job!

cruella Thanks. I'm glad you liked it. I thought all of those reasons were so stupid that they deserved some extra addressing. And yeah while there are bad sequel characters, and bad token characters, but to say they all bad are is stupid. And while there are characters that are overly sexulized, sexist and racist, and have inappropriate relationships; but Jack, Scrooge and Minnie don't quailfy for those.